Massimo, We should also look at memory footprint. IMHO we should see a good reduction of required memory and smaller growth over time.
To get some meaningful figures would be nice to use a test as simple as the above but it is possible? Btw I trust inspect and gc only to a certain level... mic Il giorno 29/ago/2012 09:38, "Johann Spies" <johann.sp...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > For an average of tree runs with cacheable = False: > > time to access field obj 0.000000740687052 > time to select 1000 recods 0.000024633059502 > time to access field values 0.000024633059502 > > With cachable = True: > > time to access field obj 0.000000823338826 > time to select 1000 recods 0.000015172052383 > time to access field values 0.000000526110331 > > > This is with Version 2.00.1 (2012-08-28 22:14:54) rc4 > and > Python 2.7.3 (default, Aug 26 2012, 11:57:48) > [GCC 4.7.1] on linux2 > > > Regards > Johann > -- > Because experiencing your loyal love is better than life itself, > my lips will praise you. (Psalm 63:3) > > -- > > > > --
