On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Barros Pena, Belen < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 13/06/2013 13:11, "Rifenbark, Scott M" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >Right now we have a small section in the dev-manual that is called "Image > >Development Using Hob". It introduces Hob as a method to develop images, > >states it is UI-driven, and tells how you can set it up and invoke it. > >It references our Hob page on the website. The section also highlights > >and lists the main functions that you can do using Hob. So I think what > >you are saying needs to be in the YP docs already exists. > > I might be reading this wrong (sorry if that's the case), but Hob and Web > Hob are different tools. Hob is a building tool and it's a native > application. The first version of Web Hob, which is what we are referring > to here, is more a build analysis tool, and it's a web application (it > runs on your browser). So it looks like we'll need: > > * A new section in the YP manuals (not sure which one of them) for Web Hob > * A new wiki page for Web Hob > * A new webpage on the website for Web hob > > According to Richard's list, the above should cover: > > * basic information about the fact the UI exists, > * how to start it, > * what the capabilities are, > * the limitations > * some indication of future plans (high level). > > If we add any developer oriented docs, those would go in the bitbake > manual. > > Would people agree with this? > I would agree. > > > Belen > > > > >Scott > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Richard Purdie [mailto:[email protected]] > >>Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 4:38 AM > >>To: Bill Traynor > >>Cc: Barros Pena, Belen; Paul Eggleton; Rifenbark, Scott M; > >>[email protected] > >>Subject: Re: [Webhob] Web Hob documentation? > >> > >>On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 07:23 -0400, Bill Traynor wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Barros Pena, Belen > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> I am not even sure if need to produce Web Hob documentation > >>> for the 1.5 > >>> release, but I thought I'd bring it up just in case. Maybe > >>> something > >>> lightweight, like the Hob manual page on the website, might be > >>> enough. > >>> > >>> Let me know what you think. > >>> > >>> Is Webhob to be a part of BitBake proper? I see that Webhob patches > >>> are hitting the bitbake-devel list. If the answer is yes, that Webhob > >>> is to be a part of BitBake and it's source code live within the > >>> BitBake source tree, then my feeling is that it's documentation should > >>> be part of the BitBake manual. > >> > >>I think the answer is "it depends". I think for 1.5 we will need some > >>basic information about the fact the UI exists, how to start it, what > >>the capabilities are, the limitations and some indication of future > >>plans (high level). This would probably be fine in the YP manuals and/or > >>on the wiki. If we do add any developer oriented docs such as how to > >>extend/customise it, those would probably be best in the bitbake manual. > >> > >>Cheers, > >> > >>Richard > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Intel Corporation (UK) Limited > Registered No. 1134945 (England) > Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ > VAT No: 860 2173 47 > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. > >
_______________________________________________ webhob mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/webhob
