Please open a bug saying we need Web Hob documentation. That way I can track it.
Thanks Belen! >-----Original Message----- >From: Barros Pena, Belen >Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 7:07 AM >To: Rifenbark, Scott M >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Webhob] Web Hob documentation? > > >On 13/06/2013 14:55, "Rifenbark, Scott M" <[email protected]> >wrote: > >>Ahh Š okay. My mistake on that. I was thinking plain, old Hob. > >No worries: I didn't give you that much to go by, to be honest. My bad. > >Should I open an issue in Bugzilla for the Web Hob documentation, or >would >you rather deal with this in some other way? > >Thanks!! > >Belen > >> >>Scott >> >>From: Bill Traynor [mailto:[email protected]] >> >>Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 6:44 AM >>To: Barros Pena, Belen >>Cc: Rifenbark, Scott M; Richard Purdie; Paul Eggleton; >>[email protected] >>Subject: Re: [Webhob] Web Hob documentation? >> >> >> >> >> >>On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Barros Pena, Belen >><[email protected]> wrote: >>On 13/06/2013 13:11, "Rifenbark, Scott M" <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >>>Right now we have a small section in the dev-manual that is called >"Image >>>Development Using Hob". It introduces Hob as a method to develop >images, >>>states it is UI-driven, and tells how you can set it up and invoke it. >>>It references our Hob page on the website. The section also >highlights >>>and lists the main functions that you can do using Hob. So I think >what >>>you are saying needs to be in the YP docs already exists. >> >>I might be reading this wrong (sorry if that's the case), but Hob and >Web >>Hob are different tools. Hob is a building tool and it's a native >>application. The first version of Web Hob, which is what we are >referring >>to here, is more a build analysis tool, and it's a web application (it >>runs on your browser). So it looks like we'll need: >> >>* A new section in the YP manuals (not sure which one of them) for Web >Hob >>* A new wiki page for Web Hob >>* A new webpage on the website for Web hob >> >>According to Richard's list, the above should cover: >> >>* basic information about the fact the UI exists, >>* how to start it, >>* what the capabilities are, >>* the limitations >>* some indication of future plans (high level). >> >>If we add any developer oriented docs, those would go in the bitbake >>manual. >> >>Would people agree with this? >> >> >>I would agree. >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Belen >> >>> >>>Scott >>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: Richard Purdie [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 4:38 AM >>>>To: Bill Traynor >>>>Cc: Barros Pena, Belen; Paul Eggleton; Rifenbark, Scott M; >>>>[email protected] >>>>Subject: Re: [Webhob] Web Hob documentation? >>>> >>>>On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 07:23 -0400, Bill Traynor wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Barros Pena, Belen >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> I am not even sure if need to produce Web Hob documentation >>>>> for the 1.5 >>>>> release, but I thought I'd bring it up just in case. Maybe >>>>> something >>>>> lightweight, like the Hob manual page on the website, might >be >>>>> enough. >>>>> >>>>> Let me know what you think. >>>>> >>>>> Is Webhob to be a part of BitBake proper? I see that Webhob >patches >>>>> are hitting the bitbake-devel list. If the answer is yes, that >Webhob >>>>> is to be a part of BitBake and it's source code live within the >>>>> BitBake source tree, then my feeling is that it's documentation >should >>>>> be part of the BitBake manual. >>>> >>>>I think the answer is "it depends". I think for 1.5 we will need some >>>>basic information about the fact the UI exists, how to start it, >what >>>>the capabilities are, the limitations and some indication of future >>>>plans (high level). This would probably be fine in the YP manuals >and/or >>>>on the wiki. If we do add any developer oriented docs such as how to >>>>extend/customise it, those would probably be best in the bitbake >manual. >>>> >>>>Cheers, >>>> >>>>Richard >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>Intel Corporation (UK) Limited >>Registered No. 1134945 (England) >>Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ >>VAT No: 860 2173 47 >> >>This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for >>the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution >>by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended >>recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ webhob mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/webhob
