On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 9:33 AM, David Kilzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 10/30/08, zaheer ahmad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > iam working on implementing save page functionality. Looks > > like its not > > already supported in the core. > > Apple's Mac port saves ".webarchive" files. The format is specific to the > CoreFoundation framework, but there is platform-specific code that does this > nevertheless. > > > Following are some high > > level ideas and iam > > not sure if some or all of these are the right approaches > > to this problem > > > > - write the page data to the file system as and when is > > received - but this > > is not optimal since this incurs constant overhead on page > > load > > Don't do this. > > > - apis to retreive the source (html, js, css) and > > image/object data > > (original form) from the document. I think the > > parsers/loaders incrementally > > handle the data and throw off the parsed text - pls > > validate my > > understanding here. > > There should be API to do this already. Look at how content for > .webarchive files is retrieved. > > > - parse and convert all the html absolute/relative URIs to > > relative URIs on > > the file system > > Bug 7211: Support save as "Web page, complete" in Firefox format > https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7211 We have code to support this feature in the Chromium code base. You can find it here: http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/webkit/glue/dom_serializer.h?view=markup http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/webkit/glue/dom_serializer.cc?view=markup It is something we would love to one day see as part of WebKit. -Darin <https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7211> > > > - any other optimized storage methods - e.g. storing the > > entire page as a > > single file using multipart content > > Bug 7169: Support exporting of MHTML web archives > https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7169 > > I would strongly encourage you to reuse an existing format rather than > inventing your own. (In my opinion the Firefox format is preferred because > it's readable by all web browsers.) > > Dave > > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
