01.06.2009, в 22:37, Drew Wilson написал(а):

1) Since SharedWorkers aren't explicitly tied to a specific Document, it doesn't make sense to have them possibly get loaded from an out-of-date version of the app cache. If you have two separate documents running from different caches, it's weird (and indeterminate) if the version of the cache used to load the SharedWorker script is dependent on which one happens to call "new SharedWorker()" first.

I don't see how exposing DOMApplicationCache methods to workers can help this - a worker will only be able to call DOMApplicationCache.update() after it has started, which is too late.

Besides, won't the document using an old version of cache break if a newer SharedWorker is suddenly returned to it? The main idea of appcache is that all application resources are versioned, so if we see SharedWorkers as part of application, they should use the same cache version. And if they are independent entities with a stable API, using an out of date version for a while cannot hurt.


As for what happens to a SharedWorker whose cache was updated? My presumption is that all future resource loads would use that cache. At that point, the SharedWorker has a few different things it could do: Reload all of its scripts again using importScripts(). This implies that its script loading is idempotent, but that's not too hard to do. Send messages to all of its client documents letting it know that it is shutting down, then invoke close() to shut itself down. The client documents can re-create the SharedWorker the next time they want one. This is inherently race-y, though, since you can't easily coordinate the shutdown of the worker with instantiations of new ones.
Do nothing at all
All of these options seem quite dangerous - it may be difficult for JS authors to write applications that won't break at update time.

A document can reload itself after updating, but SharedWorkers do not have a way to reload themselves. As you mentioned, they can reload imported scripts (but the main script will remain the same, which would be inconsistent). Or they can shut down and ask a document to re- create themselves - at which point, we can as well say that the document can update the cache.

Interaction of SharedWorkers and appcache, explicit or not, sounds like a major issue to me. It can significantly affect the design (or even make SharedWorkers not worth being added, if no acceptable solution is found).

- WBR, Alexey Proskuryakov

_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev

Reply via email to