http://blogs.gnome.org/tthurman/2008/04/30/fate-of-the-attachment-status-patches/
Seems related. I would expect they're still on their patched version. But I'm just guessing. I failed to find a version number at bugs.gnome.org -eric On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Mark Rowe<[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2009-06-19, at 15:24, Gustavo Noronha wrote: > >> On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 11:13 -0700, Eric Seidel wrote: >>> >>> It would appear bugzilla is too lame to support changing flag values >>> +/-/? are all we get. :( >>> https://bugs.webkit.org/editflagtypes.cgi >>> (only accessible to bugzilla users with edit privilages). >> >> GNOME's bugilla has several different 'states' for patches. See for >> instance: >> >> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577386 >> >> Notice that the list of patches has a combo box with various options, >> such as 'obsolete', 'needs-work', 'accepted-commit-now', >> 'accepted-commit-after-freeze', etc. >> >> Perhaps a similar structure could be used? > > That's very interesting! Do you happen to know if GNOME uses a modified > version of Bugzilla, or if that is just a feature of the newer version of > Bugzilla that we're yet to update to? > > - Mark > > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev > > _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
