On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <[email protected]> wrote: > On Apr 6, 2010, at 10:35 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote: >> On 06.04.2010, at 10:06, Adam Barth wrote: >>> I don't read webkit-changes, so I might not fully appreciate this use >>> case, but the way I know when things are rolled out is because we >>> reopen the bug and comment that patch was rolled out in a certain >>> revision. If you like, we can put more information in the ChangeLogs >>> created by sheriffbot (such as the title of the original bug). >> >> Yes, please do. >> >> I'm definitely not the only one reading webkit-changes and ChangeLogs. > > I agree that more informative revert ChangeLog entries would be useful. My > preference would be to include the following: > > - revision that was reverted > - bugzilla bug URL from the ChangeLog of the reverted commit (in a distinct > format from how we'd provide it if it was the bug for the rollout change > itself) > - summary text from the original revert > > Something like: > > - Reverted rNNNNN ("Rotate head 90 degrees clockwise") > <http://bugs.webkit.org/rollout-bug-num> > > Reverted bug was: <http://bugs.webkit.org/bug-that-reverted>
Okiedokes. I'll try to do that today. Adam _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
