On Sunday 16 September 2012, Darin Adler wrote: > On Sep 16, 2012, at 2:30 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen <k...@carewolf.com> wrote: > > On Thursday 13 September 2012, Dan Bernstein wrote: > >> On Sep 13, 2012, at 1:29 AM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <kenneth.christian...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> I was telling people to use "unsigned" instead of "unsigned int", as I > >>> have been told that was the preferred style before, but apparently > >>> that is not in the style guide. > >>> > >>> The question is, should it be? > >> > >> Yes. > > > > Why? Wouldn't it be better to move away from deprecated C syntax? > > I think we should use the shortest name for each type. > > That is why I like “unsigned” better than “unsigned int”. > Does this mean you also prefer 'const' over 'const int'? ;-)
Anyway, I have no strong opinion on the subject, like most programmers I just prefer what I am just to, and for some reason I am more used to 'unsigned int' than 'unsigned'. But I can easily live with it. This was only meant as a weekend comment. Best regards. `Allan _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
