I like that! But maybe it's too long? On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Mike Lawther <[email protected]> wrote:
> ASSERT_WITH_OTHERWISE_UNUSED. > > > On 2 October 2012 10:51, Ryosuke Niwa <[email protected]> wrote: > >> How about ASSERT_OR_UNUSED or ASSERT_USING_UNUSED? >> >> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Darin Adler <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Oct 1, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Mike Lawther <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > my first reading of that name had me thinking it meant 'ASSERT that >>> this variable is unused' in the vein of macros I've seen in other places >>> like ASSERT_TRUE, ASSERT_NOT_NULL etc. >>> >>> Yes, even though I named the macro I have had the same thought often. I >>> love the macro, but a better name, even if a bit longer, would be welcome. >>> If we can think of one we can fix this with a quick global replace. >>> >>> -- Darin >>> _______________________________________________ >>> webkit-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
