Dirk Pranke <dpra...@chromium.org> writes: > So, it seems like WK1 and WK2 keywords might be useful. However, I > don't really want to add more divergence between ports, so it would be > nice to have everyone agree to use it if we were to add it. > > What do you all think? Would you like this feature, and would you all > use it ?
At least on the EFL side I think things are good the way they are: we have platform/efl for common stuff and platform/efl-wk1 and platform/efl-wk2 for WK1- or WK2-specific stuff (not only TestExpectations files but also test results). If we got rid of those and put everything together in platform/efl, I think we'd end up with a very big TestExpectations file and don't know what we'd do with the occasional different results for WK1 and WK2. > However, this is a little awkward and gets worse if you also need to > support different expectations for multiple different configs (e.g., > mac-lion vs mac-snowleopard vs mac-mountainlion). It wouldn't really solve this problem, right? -- Intel Finland Oy Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4 Domiciled in Helsinki _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev