I think everyone is agreeing that we should have a suitable replacement for EWS.
But I also want to see us move forward with clean ups. I think such clean ups will bring clarity to what we would want our EWS testing to look like since we'll have fewer configurations to test. I like the approach of switching to manual testing in the short term, and working in parallel on an EWS replacement. Sent from my PDP-11 On Apr 4, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Brent Fulgham <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I definitely do not want to see the EWS system go away. But in the short term > , I would be in favor of manual commits and manual testing. > > We still have the build bots running tests, so it's not like we lose all > coverage. > > Thanks, > > -Brent > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Apr 4, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Geoffrey Garen <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> I'd also suggest purging the chromium layout tests ASAP so we can enjoy >>>> the much-reduced archive sync costs. >>> >>> We really need to get the Mac or Win EWS performing tests by default and >>> reliably before doing this. At present, only the chromium-linux EWS bot has >>> been consistently running tests. When Mac/Win tests were turned on >>> recently, it resulted in huge backups on those EWS bots, and eventually >>> having tests disabled. >> >> Sorry, I got excited and removed the Chromium test results before I read >> this email. >> >> If committers are willing to do their own regression testing and committing, >> we can move forward with cleaning house. (For what it's worth, that's how >> I've always worked.) >> >> Otherwise, if we want to depend on the Chromium EWS tester and the Chromium >> commit queue, we have to put cleaning house on hold. We need to keep the >> Chromium/v8 port building, and maintain its test results, until we have >> alternate sources for that stuff. If that's the consensus, I'll restore the >> cr-linux and cr-linux-x86 test results. >> >> My preference is to move forward with cleaning house. It has already reduced >> the webkit download size by 1GB. What do other folks think? >> >> Regards, >> Geoff > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
