(reposting to list due to missing subscription on this alias - woops! :)) On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Ilya Grigorik <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Yoav Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +Ilya for spec related questions. >> >> Also, I forgot to mention it, but my intention is to implement the RW and >> DPR hints first, and see about the MD and RQ hints (which are newer to the >> spec) later on. >> > > Yes, we should scope this discussion to RW and DPR. This is consistent > with Blink implementation [1], and to keep this thread focused I'll skip > the comments on MD/RQ/etc. That said, happy to discuss those in a separate > thread :) > > >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Is the Internet-Draft for this planned to become a standards-track RFC? >>> Is there an IETF Working Group that has adopted it? >>> >>> Yes, and as part of the HTTP WG. /cc mnot > >> On the spec contents: I’m wary of the fact that the header names are very >>> opaque. That’s not in the HTTP tradition, where header names are generally >>> human-readable. I am skeptical that the HTTP WG would be satisfied with >>> these header names as-is. >>> >>> I believe the intent with the short names was to minimize impact on the >> network, since the headers will be sent with every sub-resource requests >> once the server has opted-in. With that said, you're not the first to make >> that comment, so I'm open to modify that, especially since HTTP/2 makes >> this consideration irrelevant. >> > > Uncompressed bytes on the wire add up quickly and short names are > consistent with general policy of keeping those at a minimum. I don't > believe this is counter to HTTP WG goals or guidance. That said, I'm not > opposed to renaming them if there is a strong preference one way or another. > >> I know spec feedback may be off-topic for an implementation thread, but >>> I’m not sure where else to send it since it’s not clear if this >>> Internet-Draft is associated with a working group. >>> >>> Spec feedback is most welcome. The best place to send it is the GitHub >> repo <https://github.com/igrigorik/http-client-hints/issues>. >> > > Big +1 to that. This is all great feedback, thanks Maciej. > > ig > > [1] > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msg/blink-dev/vOgv-TqefsA/o_fEsy8RFcwJ > >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
