Does anyone else in the WebKit community have comments on this proposal?
- Maciej > On Apr 28, 2015, at 8:42 AM, Yoav Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: > > (Re) Posting Ilya's response from April 24th, since his response wasn't > published on the mailing list archive for some reason. > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Yoav Weiss <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > +Ilya for spec related questions. > > Also, I forgot to mention it, but my intention is to implement the RW and DPR > hints first, and see about the MD and RQ hints (which are newer to the spec) > later on. > > Yes, we should scope this discussion to RW and DPR. This is consistent with > Blink implementation [1], and to keep this thread focused I'll skip the > comments on MD/RQ/etc. That said, happy to discuss those in a separate thread > :) > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Is the Internet-Draft for this planned to become a standards-track RFC? Is >> there an IETF Working Group that has adopted it? > > Yes, and as part of the HTTP WG. /cc mnot >> On the spec contents: I’m wary of the fact that the header names are very >> opaque. That’s not in the HTTP tradition, where header names are generally >> human-readable. I am skeptical that the HTTP WG would be satisfied with >> these header names as-is. > > I believe the intent with the short names was to minimize impact on the > network, since the headers will be sent with every sub-resource requests once > the server has opted-in. With that said, you're not the first to make that > comment, so I'm open to modify that, especially since HTTP/2 makes this > consideration irrelevant. > > Uncompressed bytes on the wire add up quickly and short names are consistent > with general policy of keeping those at a minimum. I don't believe this is > counter to HTTP WG goals or guidance. That said, I'm not opposed to renaming > them if there is a strong preference one way or another. >> I know spec feedback may be off-topic for an implementation thread, but I’m >> not sure where else to send it since it’s not clear if this Internet-Draft >> is associated with a working group. > > Spec feedback is most welcome. The best place to send it is the GitHub repo > <https://github.com/igrigorik/http-client-hints/issues>. > > Big +1 to that. This is all great feedback, thanks Maciej. > > ig > > [1] > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msg/blink-dev/vOgv-TqefsA/o_fEsy8RFcwJ > > <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msg/blink-dev/vOgv-TqefsA/o_fEsy8RFcwJ>
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
