> On Apr 19, 2016, at 5:50 AM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez <clo...@igalia.com> > wrote: > >> On 18/04/16 21:50, Filip Pizlo wrote: >> I don't want a buildbot for MIPS. It's not a relevant architecture >> anymore. I don't think that JSC developers should have to expend >> effort towards keeping this architecture working. > > MIPS is still relevant on embedded devices (mainly set-top boxes). > It is also a popular platform for IoT projects.
This doesn't seem like a big enough deal to have in trunk. Have you considered an out-of-tree port? -Filip > > I understand that you don't want to spend time supporting this > architecture, and that is ok. Nobody is proposing here that JSC > developers should spend time maintaining JSC on MIPS. > > However, if someone is willing to do the work, I think we should let > them do it and don't actively block it. > > Having a buildbot testing JSC on MIPS certainly helps anyone interested > in maintaining this architecture. > > And anybody not interested in MIPS, can just ignore this bot. > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev