19.04.2016, 18:23, "Filip Pizło" <fpi...@apple.com>: >> On Apr 19, 2016, at 5:50 AM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez <clo...@igalia.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 18/04/16 21:50, Filip Pizlo wrote: >>> I don't want a buildbot for MIPS. It's not a relevant architecture >>> anymore. I don't think that JSC developers should have to expend >>> effort towards keeping this architecture working. >> >> MIPS is still relevant on embedded devices (mainly set-top boxes). >> It is also a popular platform for IoT projects. > > This doesn't seem like a big enough deal to have in trunk. > > Have you considered an out-of-tree port?
Sorry but I don't see how can it work. MIPS contributors are working on different WebKit ports and trunk is the only place where we can collaborate. Also, I would like to thank WebKit reviewers for valuable input that you are providing on MIPS patches. Sorry if it wastes a bit of your time, but I hope it is not that much. > > -Filip > >> I understand that you don't want to spend time supporting this >> architecture, and that is ok. Nobody is proposing here that JSC >> developers should spend time maintaining JSC on MIPS. >> >> However, if someone is willing to do the work, I think we should let >> them do it and don't actively block it. >> >> Having a buildbot testing JSC on MIPS certainly helps anyone interested >> in maintaining this architecture. >> >> And anybody not interested in MIPS, can just ignore this bot. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev