Finally found some benchmarks form what I can tell Firefox is significantly faster on scripts then Safari
http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#testresults It does look like the khtml engine itself is quite fast so the combination of SpiderMonkey with WebCore should make a very fast browser. Again please prove that KJS is faster then SpiderMonkey everything I finds shows not only is this not true but it is significantly slower. I see no reason that the proposal to integrate SpiderMonkey slim it down and do a little performance tunning is not valid and resonable approach. I see no reason to start from scratch on a new interpeter. Finally I think this benchmark should be run agianst webkit/IE/Firefox and the results should be on the website it would be helpful. It took me a while to find a page with a reasonable set of results. Mike On 5/26/06, Giacomo Luca Maioli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/26/06, Giacomo Luca Maioli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> But Safari throws an error while processing the last method (the >> one which actually highlight text), so you should try: >> >> >> window.getSelection().setBaseAndExtent(selDiv, 0, selDiv, 1); >> >> So you'll only need to play around with this (strange and mostly >> unknown) method. > > I'm afraid Safari doesn't appear to support setBaseAndExtent() method > on a selection, either. > I just tested the code on both Firefox and Safari. You can find a working example here: http://www.tricheco.net/selection.html I'm using Safari Version 2.0.3 (417.9.3) and Firefox 1.5.0.3 on Mac and Windows. _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.opendarwin.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.opendarwin.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
