On May 26, 2006, at 2:08 PM, Mike Emmel wrote:
Finally found some benchmarks form what I can tell Firefox is
significantly faster on scripts
then Safari
http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html#testresults
On the test you linked I see Safari 2.0 getting 27 seconds compared
to Firefox 1.5's 40 seconds on the script speed test. That's even
just Safari 2.0.... TOT is much faster than 2.0. Your definition of
"fast" doesn't seem to match up with mine. :)
Which specific JavaScript test in that chart shows Firefox to be
faster than Safari?
Again please prove that KJS is faster then SpiderMonkey everything I
finds shows not only is this not true but it is significantly slower.
Everything you find where? You've linked to a benchmark that shows
JavaScriptCore is faster.... not really helping your case any... :)
I see no reason that the proposal to integrate SpiderMonkey slim it
down and do a little performance tunning is not valid and resonable
approach. I see no reason to start from scratch on a new interpeter.
Who is starting from scratch? Our interpreter has been around for
years.
Finally I think this benchmark should be run agianst webkit/IE/Firefox
and the results should be on the website it would be helpful. It took
me a while to find a page with a reasonable set of results.
Results that you seem to have misread.... maybe you should keep digging.
Cheers,
dave
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.opendarwin.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
