(Sigh, pardon the OWA top posting..) I agree with Jocelyn 100%.
Also, starting a new stabilization branch based on another still-open stabilization branch is madness. I'd love to hear the reasoning behind this. ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of ext Jocelyn Turcotte [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 23:16 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [webkit-qt] QtWebKit-2.2 branch is now open On 10-12-16 10:52 PM, ext Antonio Gomes wrote: > You possibly had discussed that, but why not make 2.2 to be 2.1, since > the later is not release yet. > > The real 2.2 could be based on trunk ... > > If we can refrain from adding any API, It would be nice to have this pseudo-2.2 called 2.1.1 instead. I would also prefer 2.2 to being branched from trunk. Since the new features will probably have a limited scope, we can guarantee a reliable stability improvement between 2.1 and 2.1.1, IMHO. Jocelyn _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
