On 12/17/2010 06:54 PM, ext [email protected] wrote:
You possibly had discussed that, but why not make 2.2 to be 2.1, since
the later is not release yet.
QtWebKit 2.2 is indeed a bit confusing name for the branch that Ademar just
created. It could be called 2.1.1 (or something like that) instead, since the
intent is only to back-port HTML5 media support on mobile platforms to once it
is ready. No new C++ APIs should be needed for that. I don't think we'll have
to maintain 2.1 and this branch separately since they'll be very much the same.
Can we hear from someone who is *for* this? It seems that everyone is
against it so far :)
-Kling
_______________________________________________
webkit-qt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
