Hey there, we at KDAB would be interested in making QWebChannel [1] "official". What I mean by that is merging its code into QtWebKit and publishing its functionality via either
- a new libqmlwebkitchannelplugin.so or similar - the existing libqmlwebkitexperimentalplugin.so - the existing libqmlwebkitplugin.so Noam said that he has no intention in maintaining this code anymore. But I already did some cleanups [2] and want to fix some more bugs I encountered. Once that it done, would there be any opposition against merging this code and making it the official "this is how you connect HTML/WK2 and QML2/QObject" solution? Generally, do you think the approach taken by Noam is the "right" one? Personally, I find it very elegant and would think that many use cases of the old C++ API could be supported by the webchannel. Cheers [1]: https://gitorious.org/qt-labs/qwebchannel [2]: https://qt.gitorious.org/~milianw/qt-labs/milianws-qwebchannel -- Milian Wolff | [email protected] | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company Tel. Germany +49-30-521325470, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-qt
