On Monday 21 January 2013 12:09:09 Milian Wolff wrote: > Hey there, > > we at KDAB would be interested in making QWebChannel [1] "official". What I > mean by that is merging its code into QtWebKit and publishing its > functionality via either > > - a new libqmlwebkitchannelplugin.so or similar > - the existing libqmlwebkitexperimentalplugin.so > - the existing libqmlwebkitplugin.so > > Noam said that he has no intention in maintaining this code anymore. But I > already did some cleanups [2] and want to fix some more bugs I encountered. > Once that it done, would there be any opposition against merging this code > and making it the official "this is how you connect HTML/WK2 and > QML2/QObject" solution? > > Generally, do you think the approach taken by Noam is the "right" one? > Personally, I find it very elegant and would think that many use cases of > the old C++ API could be supported by the webchannel.
Debugging the polling issue, I figured that I'll have to rewrite this code based on web sockets to make it reliable. A generic QML websocket server would help tremendously for that - I'll investigate. Cheers -- Milian Wolff | [email protected] | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company Tel. Germany +49-30-521325470, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-qt
