Stephen Compall <[email protected]> writes: > Jan Rychter <[email protected]> writes: >> Since I'm lazy, I figured I'd check here for quick advice -- if I pull >> this: >> https://www.bitbucket.org/S11001001/weblocks-clsql-fluid/changeset/e453eb9183bf/ >> >> will I be fine? Or is there more to it? > > See this thread: > > http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks/browse_thread/thread/4082b437543fa262
Oops, I seem to have missed it. Thanks! > As well as bug #61. > > Problem reports should probably be appended to #61. hfsbo.com has been > running it for a few days and all seems well. Thanks. I will start using it immediately. I am rather appalled at the fact that weblocks with clsql is broken out of the box. I think this very clearly marks it as very experimental software, and issues such as backwards compatibility become moot. We still have a long way to go. --J. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
