On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 10:32:32PM +0100, Jan Rychter wrote: > I am rather appalled at the fact that weblocks with clsql is broken out > of the box. I think this very clearly marks it as very experimental > software, and issues such as backwards compatibility become moot. We > still have a long way to go.
You can't take an arbitrary part of a large system and use it to judge the whole system. For example I don't use CLSQL at all, and Slava probably didn't test it very thoroughly either. I believe only recently people (you, Yarek, Stephen) have started using it for real-world apps. Not so with other parts: I have used views extensively enough to fix some serious problems with them (although not on the design level), for example. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
