[...]
> I still don't like set-children-of-type (it's not really about the > name, just the way the whole thing is rubs me the wrong way), but I > can't come up with a reasonable improvment. I agree. It doesn't smell right to me either. And when something feels wrong, it usually points to a conceptual mismatch. I think in this case it results from trying to mix widget composition with CLOS inheritance. Again: I have been defending the functionality, not the implementation. I would love to see something better. --J. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
