On Feb 23, 11:45 pm, Jan Rychter <[email protected]> wrote: > Leslie, you restated the problem well. But, as I wrote before, even > though I am not entirely happy with get/set-children-of-type, I am not > in favor of playing with method combinations in this case and I know of > no other solutions. So, being the practical type, I just use what I > wrote and it works for me.
I'm going to start working on it (not necessarily the append protocol yet) and keep you all up to date. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
