On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Pascal Costanza <[email protected]> wrote: > Someone should do it, so that we all get feedback... ;) Actually, it would be pretty cool to make support for these constructs in cl-cont optional, so that if ContextL is loaded prior to cl-cont, catch, throw, etc. can be supported. This way we don't force to depend on ContextL if they don't need the additional features.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
