On 14 Apr 2009, at 00:30, Vyacheslav Akhmechet wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Pascal Costanza <[email protected]> wrote: >> Someone should do it, so that we all get feedback... ;) > Actually, it would be pretty cool to make support for these constructs > in cl-cont optional, so that if ContextL is loaded prior to cl-cont, > catch, throw, etc. can be supported. This way we don't force to depend > on ContextL if they don't need the additional features. OK, I made a small change to ContextL such that :contextl is now on the *features* list when ContextL is loaded. This should help. Best, Pascal -- ELS'09: http://www.european-lisp-symposium.org/ Pascal Costanza, mailto:[email protected], http://p-cos.net Vrije Universiteit Brussel Programming Technology Lab Artificial Intelligence Lab Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussel, Belgium --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
