Chris Hallwright wrote:
> They could be combined - it just means newbies would still have to > comment out all references to the sandbox to get their objects to > persist. I was aiming for configuration-only changes within a version > if possible. Sorry for being daft, but why couldn't they just change the type and location of the sandbox store to match their requirements? > On the contrary, I wasn't seeing any special features of SQL to > employ, although no doubt there are some. It was more that the models > for these relational variants cannot employ inheritance, which limits > what can be done with relational IMHO. But basic inheritance is supported using DEF-VIEW-CLASS's :BASE-TABLE initarg[1]. Did you mean something else? Leslie [1] http://clsql.b9.com/manual/ch02s02.html --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
