On Jun 4, 4:25 pm, "Leslie P. Polzer" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Chris Hallwright wrote:
> > But just to be clear, are you OK with a separate relational (i.e. non-
> > object) version along the lines of the current CLSQL and Elephant
> > demos? I see that as essential because the models have to be
> > different -all of person's slots are in employee and there is no
> > person model in these "relational" versions because there's no
> > inheritance, with a ripple effect onto views as well. I can't see any
> > alternative to having a separate version (like the current CLSQL and
> > Elephant versions) for purely reklational database users (typically
> > MySQL). What do you think?
>
> Fine in general, but I still don't get why the CLSQL version isn't
> enough...
Sorry - yes, it is enough. I'm just thinking about how to break up
the demos differently from the current way. I think I'll just
experiment a bit first and see what I come up with.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"weblocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
