On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:59:06AM -0700, Mackram wrote:
>
> Yes i like the idea of abstraction and it makes sense that way but I
> was thinking more along the following lines:
> weblocks.js:
> function applyEffect(type, targetEl) {}
>
> weblocks-jquery.js:
> window.applyEffect = function(type,targetEL){....} /* jquery impl
> */
>
> weblocks-prototype.js
> window.applyEffect = function(type,targetEL){....} /* prototype/
> scriptaculous impl */
>
> That way the lisp code will only add the required implementation
> rather then all of them and hence make the js code smaller. Also it
> would probably make debugging easy.
>
> What do you think?
Yes, that was my intention above, I just left out the file names for
brevity.
However I think that every backend should have a separate
directory to make it possible to use multiple files without
cluttering one top-level directory.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"weblocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
