On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Leslie P. Polzer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Dec 23, 8:34 am, Scott Burson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hmm, okay. It seems to be sufficient to allow me to begin developing >> my app, which solves my immediate problem. > > We can solve any problems that come up with your approach as you go > along. I like your solution because it ties in neatly with what we've > planned for the new Postmodern store.
So the Postmodern backend has a similar problem? I'm wondering if I should be trying to use Postmodern instead of CLSQL -- but my very superficial impression, when I looked at both of them, was that CLSQL looked more mature and fully-featured. Postmodern is an option, though, because I'm using Postgres anyway. The CLSQL query syntax does look a bit weird, but I don't know if Postmodern's is really that much of an improvement. > The problem is in the CLSQL code, and we should strive to fix it in > their code and submit a patch against the official repository or at > worst devise our own hack for it if that isn't feasible for some > reason. Well, of course, Stephen already tried submitting a patch once. That's why I'm wondering how much effort was put into persuading Kevin to accept it. -- Scott -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en.
