ghItlhpu' o_z <[email protected]>: > Hi, I've met situation where too many widgets were rendered only because > their slots values were changed. > For any widget there are only few slots on which widget state depends. So > there is no need to have :affects-dirty-status-p T for any slot. > Yes, it would require new major release number but let it be as it is. > I think :affects-dirty-status-p set to T by default is a mistake. It helps > to avoid some (mark-dirty ...) statements but gives restrictions for cases > where some widgets should not be rendered.
Ok, I see your point. Are you now going through all the widgets built in in weblocks and see where `MARK-DIRTY` or `:AFFECTS-DIRTY-STATUS-P T` is neccessary? I had some trouble with gridedit now updating automatically when I wanted to add a new item (but recent commits in the main repository may have fixed that; I will it out soon). Best, Daniel -- Daniel Borchmann http://daniel.kxpq.de GPG (Mail) 0849 473E 6BF0 B504 DF0B D640 455E 3610 01FF 778F -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
