Quicklisp just updated the version it has, and after updating, I noticed that the gridedit "Add" doesn't force a redraw, so has no effect. Is that related to this change?
On Friday, January 16, 2015 at 3:50:43 PM UTC-8, o_z wrote: > > I will fix widgets bugs if they appear but not going to check all widgets. > Weblocks selenium tests work now, that's enough for me at this point. > > суббота, 10 января 2015 г., 12:34:37 UTC+2 пользователь Daniel Borchmann > написал: >> >> ghItlhpu' o_z <[email protected]>: >> > Hi, I've met situation where too many widgets were rendered only >> because >> > their slots values were changed. >> > For any widget there are only few slots on which widget state depends. >> So >> > there is no need to have :affects-dirty-status-p T for any slot. >> > Yes, it would require new major release number but let it be as it is. >> > I think :affects-dirty-status-p set to T by default is a mistake. It >> helps >> > to avoid some (mark-dirty ...) statements but gives restrictions for >> cases >> > where some widgets should not be rendered. >> >> Ok, I see your point. Are you now going through all the widgets built >> in in weblocks and see where `MARK-DIRTY` or `:AFFECTS-DIRTY-STATUS-P T` >> is neccessary? I had some trouble with gridedit now updating >> automatically when I wanted to add a new item (but recent commits in the >> main repository may have fixed that; I will it out soon). >> >> Best, >> >> Daniel >> >> -- >> Daniel Borchmann http://daniel.kxpq.de >> GPG (Mail) 0849 473E 6BF0 B504 DF0B D640 455E 3610 01FF 778F >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
