Hi, Anjo & Mike,
On Apr 27, 2006, at 1:10 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Hi Jerry,
Am 27.04.2006 um 16:13 schrieb Jerry W. Walker:
This model work great when the wrapper is mostly static, or
doesn't interact directly with the actual content shown.
For these things, there is Wonder's ERXWOTemplate and
ERXWOComponentContent. It kind of makes your head explode when
you use it first, but with these you can have multiple component
contents in your wrapper that get filled out by designated areas
in the "real" page.
That's awesome! You're going to move me to being a Wonder user
yet, Anjo.
:)
I actually downloaded the latest version and started looking
through the code. Haven't gotten far yet; work related tasks
consume so much of my free time. :-)
Just make sure you use a nightly build from Mike site. I will
probably make a new binary release in the next few weeks, but it
depends on how much comes up. And with the nightly builds it's not
so pressing anymore anyway.
You should really take a look at the new Ajax stuff, it's pretty
cool and offers a lot of possibilities. Oh, here's a cool Ajax-
based app I've stumbled across:
http://www.zimbra.com/
Actually, the Ajax stuff that Mike described recently on the list was
what finally pushed me into downloading the build. Now that I have it
on my machine, I will start reviewing it. Unfortunately, "real work"
tasks keep getting in the way.
On Apr 27, 2006, at 1:23 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
You should really take a look at the new Ajax stuff, it's pretty
cool and offers a lot of possibilities. Oh, here's a cool Ajax-
based app I've stumbled across:
Sort of a wonder-dev topic, but judging by emails I've gotten,
there's a fair amount of interest about Ajax in webobjects-dev
too ... I'm curious what other Ajax components people would like to
see WO-wrapped? We have the core interactive Scriptaculous
features wrapped. Currently none of the effects are wrapped, but
then I'm not sure having WO wrappers lends too much over just
javascript calls (open for opinions here). If you've run into a
situation where WO didn't bring it for your UI and the current
components don't provide support, drop me a line. I'd love to
remove a Ruby checkmark in the WO-vs-Ruby comparison.
I'm all for removing those Ruby checkmarks.
More generally, thanks Mike and the rest of the Wonder team for
addressing the Ajax/WO issue so helpfully.
Regards,
Jerry
--
__ Jerry W. Walker,
WebObjects Developer/Instructor for High Performance Industrial
Strength Internet Enabled Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
203 278-4085 office
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to archive@mail-archive.com
