Contributions of any kind are welcomed ... My goal recently with the
framework has been to provide all the Ajax capabilities that Ruby
brags of, but in the WO-way. I know you aren't a component-action
fan :) , but that's been my focus with the framework recently -- so
that it's not just a thin wrapper around the libraries, rather you
actually get some of the WO component-action-style "magic" with it
too (drag-and-drop is a good example of that ... It actually lets you
drag and drop real objects (as far as your components are concerned)
vs just having ID's passed around -- feels too servlety to me :) ).
However, having a good set of DirectAction-based Ajax tools would be
very cool, and I do have wikibook fetish as of late, so I'm all for
documentation as well. I would say to take your pick, because people
will be into either one, I think.
ms
On May 23, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Pierce T. Wetter III wrote:
On May 23, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
For the record, I'm only one of about three people who have worked
on Wonder's Ajax framework ... Don't want too much credit
attributed :)
Ah, then there shouldn't be any issues if I make additions to it,
as long as I follow my own advice and document them well.
Or would you rather I spent time on the documentation? It's almost
easier for me to do that at the moment...
Pierce
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to archive@mail-archive.com
