On May 23, 2006, at 12:54 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
Contributions of any kind are welcomed ... My goal recently with the framework has been to provide all the Ajax capabilities that Ruby brags of, but in the WO-way. I know you aren't a component- action fan :) ,
Actually, I LOVE component actions. I just tell my engineers I better see a <FORM> tag somewhere... And component actions would be great for lots of Ajax stuff, because you want to be able to pull state into the URL.
but that's been my focus with the framework recently -- so that it's not just a thin wrapper around the libraries, rather you actually get some of the WO component-action-style "magic" with it too (drag-and-drop is a good example of that ... It actually lets you drag and drop real objects (as far as your components are concerned) vs just having ID's passed around -- feels too servlety to me :) ). However, having a good set of DirectAction-based Ajax tools would be very cool, and I do have wikibook fetish as of late, so I'm all for documentation as well. I would say to take your pick, because people will be into either one, I think.
Well, I'll start on the wikibook stuff and we'll go from there. Pierce _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to archive@mail-archive.com
