I do agree, I hate relational DBs. The problem is that I still
didn't find any other persistent store that:
1) Can scale and handle high load (in a real environment, not
just on the spec sheet);
2) Is affordable/free;
3) Integrates well with powerful frameworks like WO.
http://www.intersystems.com/cache/index.html
I don't yet know a lot about this, but from reading their feature
list, systems like this may be in our near future.
Feature and Benefits:
http://www.intersystems.com/cache/technology/fb/fb_02.html
On Apr 8, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
On 2008/04/08, at 17:12, Robert Walker wrote:
Speaking of that, why do we continue the "Cargo Cult" of the
relational database? Isn't it about time to move past them, and
begin moving to persistent storage that makes sense in the modern
age of objects?
That's all I'll say on the subject. I'm not trying to start a long
discussion that will all end in tears.
I do agree, I hate relational DBs. The problem is that I still
didn't find any other persistent store that:
1) Can scale and handle high load (in a real environment, not
just on the spec sheet);
2) Is affordable/free;
3) Integrates well with powerful frameworks like WO.
When something comes up that meets these criteria, I will move on
the first day. I feel the same as you, it's incredible how little
databases have evolved in the last decades. But if making a good
alternative was easy, we would have lots of them around, I guess.
Yours
Miguel Arroz
Miguel Arroz
http://www.terminalapp.net
http://www.ipragma.com
Robert Walker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
