On 08.04.2008, at 15:07, Chuck Hill wrote:
1. WebObjects is proprietary
So is Windows. Why aren't they running BSD or Linux? ;-)
Touché! I see this as more of a manufactured justification than a
real reason.
It always is. Is the management killer argument when they don't have
arguments. Idiots.
2. New versions of WebObjects is not supported on Windows
What do they understand by support? The frameworks can be used on
*any* platform
Windows is not an officially supported platform. There is the
matter of a web server adaptor on Windows. There are options, but
it is not a supported, out of box experience.
Is it on Mac OS X? Was there working support in the last five years
other than from the mailing list?
I think they meant "lack of unemployed, knowledgeable WebObjects
programmers". Most (all?) of us are gainfully employed most of the
time. Good WO developers are a little hard to find.
As it is with all "good" developers. But there are much more morons
running around claiming to be experts in technology XY than for
WebObjects.
cug
--
http://www.event-s.net
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
