IMO, there's no excuse for somebody saying there aren't any good WO
developers to hire these days. I know of several who are working on
J2EE stuff that would gladly jump to a WO project if one came up. I'm
more than happy to be working in WO now, I actually think it's much
better now than just a few years ago. At least I feel like there's
more WO going on these days (I actually got a WO call from a recruiter
the other day, yikes!)
Don't give up WO because of all these reasons--do what I do and show
them that WO is better for all the right reasons and make them come
around. There are lots of reasons to stick with it.
On Apr 8, 2008, at 5:46 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
3. Perceived lack of knowledgeable WebObjects programmers (I'm in
the Chicago suburbs -- Northbrook, IL, to be precise)
...
Perhaps they've not been paying attention to the mailings lists.
(specifically: webobjects-dev, wonder-disc, woproject-dev).
...
I think they meant "lack of unemployed, knowledgeable WebObjects
programmers". Most (all?) of us are gainfully employed most of the
time. Good WO developers are a little hard to find.
I'm having a lull at the moment if anybody wants to discuss
anything... :)
cheers.
___
Andrew Lindesay
www.lindesay.co.nz
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/jas35%40mac.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
