On Apr 26, 2011, at 5:16 AM, Theodore Petrosky wrote: > I am presenting a table to my user and I am noticing that the number of rows > that they want to keep current is growing to more than 1k. > > One of the UI issues is to color individual rows that signify specific meta > data (ie. row is red so it is important, green is something else). > > Currently, I have one AjaxUpdateContainer wrapping the whole table. If the > user updates the row color, I fire the container update. But with over 1k > rows, this is starting to take time (10 - 15 seconds). So I thought that I > would wrap the individual row in its own update container. > > Before I jump into this, I thought I would ask. If I had 1000 update > containers on my page, am I shooting myself in the foot? Or is this what the > AjaxUpdateContainer is made for? Or do I have to update the whole table for > the row color to update (with CSS)?
It is probably not much worse than a 1000 row table, a 1000 row table is pretty bad already. :-) That is a terrible interface, IMO. You need to batch the data and keep the table small. See AjaxGrid for one way to do this. Chuck -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com