Ah yes, I tried that option, but in one of our projects, which originated as a
non-Wonder project, it doesn't work:
ERROR com.webobjects.eoaccess.ERXEntityDependencyOrderingDelegate - Unexpected
non-EOGeneralAdaptorException exception
IllegalStateException: Attempt to access an EO that has either not been
inserted into any EOEditingContext or its EOEditingContext has already been
disposed
at com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOCustomObject.willRead(EOCustomObject.java:1158)
at
com.webobjects.eocontrol._EOMutableKnownKeyDictionary$Initializer$_GenericRecordBinding.valueInObject(_EOMutableKnownKeyDictionary.java:570)
at
com.webobjects.eocontrol._EOMutableKnownKeyDictionary$Initializer$_LazyGenericRecordBinding.valueInObject(_EOMutableKnownKeyDictionary.java:613)
at
com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOCustomObject.storedValueForKey(EOCustomObject.java:1634)
at
net.starhealthcare.sffoundation.model.base._SFActor.sFIncidentsAsActor(_SFActor.java:48)
... skipped 6 stack elements
at
er.extensions.eof.ERXGenericRecord$InverseRelationshipUpdater.takeStoredValueForKey(ERXGenericRecord.java:1619)
at
er.extensions.eof.ERXGenericRecord.takeStoredValueForKey(ERXGenericRecord.java:1400)
at
com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOKeyValueCoding$_StoredForwardingBinding.setValueInObject(EOKeyValueCoding.java:240)
... skipped 2 stack elements
at
com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOObjectStoreCoordinator.initializeObject(EOObjectStoreCoordinator.java:597)
at
com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOEditingContext.initializeObject(EOEditingContext.java:3768)
... skipped 3 stack elements
at
com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOObjectStoreCoordinator.objectsWithFetchSpecification(EOObjectStoreCoordinator.java:488)
at
com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOEditingContext.objectsWithFetchSpecification(EOEditingContext.java:4069)
... skipped 1 stack elements
at
com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOObjectStoreCoordinator.objectsForSourceGlobalID(EOObjectStoreCoordinator.java:634)
at
com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOEditingContext.objectsForSourceGlobalID(EOEditingContext.java:3923)
... skipped 1 stack elements
at
com.webobjects.eoaccess.EOAccessArrayFaultHandler.completeInitializationOfObject(EOAccessArrayFaultHandler.java:77)
at
com.webobjects.eocontrol._EOCheapCopyMutableArray.willRead(_EOCheapCopyMutableArray.java:39)
at
com.webobjects.eocontrol._EOCheapCopyMutableArray.count(_EOCheapCopyMutableArray.java:96)
at com.webobjects.foundation.NSArray.containsObject(NSArray.java:454)
at
com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOCustomObject.includeObjectIntoPropertyWithKey(EOCustomObject.java:904)
at
er.extensions.eof.ERXGenericRecord.includeObjectIntoPropertyWithKey(ERXGenericRecord.java:1375)
On 02.08.2011, at 18:38, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
> Not sure if your template is the same as mine, but for me, both methods do
> the EXACT SAME thing when
> er.extensions.ERXEnterpriseObject.updateInverseRelationships property is set
> to true. ( @see
> er.extensions.eof.ERXGenericRecord.InverseRelationshipUpdater.updateInverseRelationships()
> ). So you could actually set that property to true and get rid of the
> setXxxxRelationship method (or at least add @Deprecated to it so it can be
> hidden from code-assist) from your eogen template. Mike Schrag wrote that
> feature …. and it does the "right" thing. However, IIRC it is 'false' by
> default
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]
