Ricardo, No, you were dreaming. :-)
Regards, Kieran. (Sent from my iPhone) On Aug 4, 2011, at 5:35 PM, "Ricardo J. Parada" <[email protected]> wrote: > I thought there was something about this in one of the sessions in this > WOWODC 2011 but I can't recall. Something about selecting > ERXUnmodeledToManyRelationship in the entity modeler but I don't see it. > > Is there such as thing in entity modeler? > > Thanks, > Ricardo > > > > > On Aug 2, 2011, at 1:02 PM, Jesse Tayler wrote: > >> Ok, I haven't even looked yet -- so excuse if I'm off base -- >> >> But shouldn't this be a part of the eo-templates? >> >> Just about every model has this potential problem, so is there a reason we >> can't check off a box in the modeler to suggest this is a unmodeled to-many >> or something and generate the methods? >> >> Not that making the method is hard or anything, more that it seems like a >> solid standard practice that should be elevated in visibility? >> >> >> >> On Aug 2, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote: >> >>> It's easy, ….. >>> >>> (1) Copy and paste the example from that >>> er.extensions.eof.ERXUnmodeledToManyRelationship class javadoc into BBEdit >>> >>> (2) Do some find/replace editing >>> >>> (3) Paste the result into your entity class that needs to have the >>> "unmodeled" toMany relationship. >>> >>> (4) Delete the model toMany relationship in the relationships pane in the >>> EOModel. >>> >>> Test, and you are done. >>> >>> I have thought about having some user-info entry in the model entity that >>> could be used to auto generate this boiler-plate code in the eogen >>> superclass, but it just has not been a priority for me. >>> >>> Regards, Kieran >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Aug 2, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Jesse Tayler wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Aug 2, 2011, at 12:38 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote: >>>> >>>>> On a related note, with regards tens of millions on one side of a to-many >>>>> …. that will kill your performance on saving a change to that >>>>> relationship unless you make the relationship a one-sided relationship. >>>>> @see er.extensions.eof.ERXUnmodeledToManyRelationship<S, D> for one >>>>> solution to that situation. I recommend using an "unmodeled" toMany for >>>>> any relationship where the toMany can be in the thousands. YMMV. >>>> >>>> this is of interest to me -- >>>> >>>> any docs or just code to read on this subject? >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/rparada%40mac.com >> >> This email sent to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
