I'd be interested as well. I have always admired smalltalk as a language.
On 2011-09-27, at 4:38 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote: > Hello Aaron; > > Would you be able to give a brief overview of Smalltalk+Seaside so we can > understand what is WebObjects-esque about it? > > cheers > > On 28/09/11 11:02 AM, Chuck Hill wrote: >> Hi Aaron, >> >> On 2011-09-27, at 9:19 AM, arosenzw...@clinworx.com wrote: >> >>> What is cool about Smalltalk / Seaside with respect to WO? >>> >>> 5) Even better than "in-line" binding it has no template file what-so-ever >>> by design. All your HTML output is coded in the programming language. No >>> more unbalanced DIV tags. Everything is refactorable. >> >> Is that better? In my imagination that makes it like PHP. Would that not >> obstruct what little view of page structure that is still there in WO? > > -- > Andrew Lindesay > www.silvereye.co.nz > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40global-village.net > > This email sent to ch...@global-village.net -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
