when I did the update, I worked with ‘bela’
this is from an email I sent in Jan 2015:
> There are some internals that had to be adjusted, but when I updated
> ERJGroupsSynchronizer, I worked directly with Bela (jGroups author) to
> understand the changes needed.
> In a nutshell, he eliminated his Exception checking and changed to use the
> Java Exceptions. remove the section:
>
> if
> (ERXProperties.booleanForKeyWithDefault("er.extensions.jgroupsSynchronizer.autoReconnect",
> true)) {
> _channel.setOpt(Channel.AUTO_RECONNECT, Boolean.TRUE);
> }
> as (in his words) Shunning was removed a long time ago.
>
> there are a couple of others and he said, <bela__> tedpet: I also suggest use
> a config file shipped with the version you download, e.g. udp.xml, and then
> make slight modifications to it, if needed"
I have this working on a production server.
Ted
On May 1, 2015, at 9:13 AM, Ken Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Paul,
>
> These are the basic reasons I didn’t tackle this as well. I can’t imagine
> anyone would want to use the very old JGroups jar, but who knows? Maybe we
> need a way for someone to post feedback so that we can determine whether or
> not it’s OK to upgrade.
>
> Ken
>
>> On May 1, 2015, at 9:10 AM, Paul Hoadley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ted,
>>
>> On 1 May 2015, at 10:05 pm, Theodore Petrosky <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> don’t know if this is of interest but I created a pull request for this:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/wocommunity/wonder/pull/626
>>
>> Thanks for pointing this out. I didn’t know this pull request was open. It
>> kind of helps to demonstrate, though, why I was reluctant to touch the
>> framework directly myself—I simply don’t know enough about it. What I got
>> running on EC2, for example, uses the 3.4.0 JAR. Does this matter? I don’t
>> know. Does updating 2.6.8 to 3.4.0 (let alone 3.6.1) cause
>> backward-compatibility issues? I don’t know. Mike Schrag wrote it, and
>> he’s long gone—does anyone else understand it deeply? I don’t know.
>>
>> This also ties in nicely with the thread started by Jean Pierre Malrieu the
>> other day. A pull request like Ted’s doesn’t sit there for three months
>> untouched because no one cares, it’s because no one _dares_.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Paul Hoadley
>> http://logicsquad.net/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kenlists%40anderhome.com
>>
>> This email sent to [email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]
