Doing something about this, right now. > On May 1, 2015, at 9:20 AM, Theodore Petrosky <[email protected]> wrote: > > when I did the update, I worked with ‘bela’ > > this is from an email I sent in Jan 2015: > >> There are some internals that had to be adjusted, but when I updated >> ERJGroupsSynchronizer, I worked directly with Bela (jGroups author) to >> understand the changes needed. >> In a nutshell, he eliminated his Exception checking and changed to use the >> Java Exceptions. remove the section: >> >> if >> (ERXProperties.booleanForKeyWithDefault("er.extensions.jgroupsSynchronizer.autoReconnect", >> true)) { >> _channel.setOpt(Channel.AUTO_RECONNECT, Boolean.TRUE); >> } >> as (in his words) Shunning was removed a long time ago. >> >> there are a couple of others and he said, <bela__> tedpet: I also suggest >> use a config file shipped with the version you download, e.g. udp.xml, and >> then make slight modifications to it, if needed" > > > I have this working on a production server. > > Ted > > On May 1, 2015, at 9:13 AM, Ken Anderson <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> Paul, >> >> These are the basic reasons I didn’t tackle this as well. I can’t imagine >> anyone would want to use the very old JGroups jar, but who knows? Maybe we >> need a way for someone to post feedback so that we can determine whether or >> not it’s OK to upgrade. >> >> Ken >> >>> On May 1, 2015, at 9:10 AM, Paul Hoadley <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Ted, >>> >>> On 1 May 2015, at 10:05 pm, Theodore Petrosky <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>>> don’t know if this is of interest but I created a pull request for this: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/wocommunity/wonder/pull/626 >>>> <https://github.com/wocommunity/wonder/pull/626> >>> Thanks for pointing this out. I didn’t know this pull request was open. >>> It kind of helps to demonstrate, though, why I was reluctant to touch the >>> framework directly myself—I simply don’t know enough about it. What I got >>> running on EC2, for example, uses the 3.4.0 JAR. Does this matter? I >>> don’t know. Does updating 2.6.8 to 3.4.0 (let alone 3.6.1) cause >>> backward-compatibility issues? I don’t know. Mike Schrag wrote it, and >>> he’s long gone—does anyone else understand it deeply? I don’t know. >>> >>> This also ties in nicely with the thread started by Jean Pierre Malrieu the >>> other day. A pull request like Ted’s doesn’t sit there for three months >>> untouched because no one cares, it’s because no one _dares_. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Paul Hoadley >>> http://logicsquad.net/ <http://logicsquad.net/> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>) >>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kenlists%40anderhome.com >>> >>> <https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kenlists%40anderhome.com> >>> >>> This email sent to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects%40avendasora.com > > This email sent to [email protected]
————————————————————————————— WebObjects - so easy that even Dave Avendasora can do it!™ ————————————————————————————— David Avendasora Senior Software Abuser Nekesto, Inc.
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
