|
Hi folks, Just for your interest, I worked up a clever (if I may say so myself) but obscure alternative to web.py's storage facility: >>> class storage(dict): ... def __new__(cls, *args, **kwargs): ... self = dict.__new__(cls, *args, **kwargs) ... self.__dict__ = self ... return self ... >>> k=storage(a=3) >>> k {'a': 3} >>> k.b=4 >>> k {'a': 3, 'b': 4} >>> --
Berwyn Hoyt,
Senior Hardware Engineer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Berwyn Hoyt, Electronics & Engineering -- Brush Technology Ph: +64 3 359 2101 Mobile: +64 21 045 7830 Web: brush.co.nz Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
Title: --
- [webpy] Alternate to web.py's storage() Berwyn Hoyt
- [webpy] Re: Alternate to web.py's storage() Anand Chitipothu
- [webpy] Re: Alternate to web.py's storage() Tzury Bar Yochay
- [webpy] Re: Alternate to web.py's storage() [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [webpy] Re: Alternate to web.py's storage() anandology
- [webpy] Re: Alternate to web.py's storage() [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [webpy] Re: Alternate to web.py's storage() mobiledreamers
