It does solve both of those issues, *technically*. I don't really understand your hostility to tagging, though. Would it negatively impact you in any way? Is the cost of making tags so high? Having simple, sequential integer tags is nice for pypi, RPM and lots of other systems.
In another thread today, the 0.34 was announced! Clearly there someone else saw some utility in doing so. Gregg On Mar 19, 2:27 pm, Branko Vukelic <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Gregg Lind <[email protected]> wrote: > > Tagging doesn't preclude making a custom package, or just following > > HEAD. It does make it easier for me to update 100 machines that run > > web.py at once. What's wrong with that? > > Use timestamp-based versioning scheme in conjunction with GitHub's > tarballing of individual commits. That solves both update issue, and > known version issue, doesn't it? > > -- > Branko Vukelić > > http://foxbunny.tumblr.com/http://www.flickr.com/photos/16889...@n04/http://www.twitter.com/foxbunnyhttp://github.com/foxbunny -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en.
