Quoting "Anand Chitipothu" <anandol...@gmail.com>:
Main Priorities:
* Python3 support
Would the upcoming 3.4 async API be useful for web.py?
* Better integration with third-party tools
Yes, I tried to integrate web.py with dbus, which needs the
glib mainloop. The solution was multiprocessing - not nice.
If there are any parts of web.py that you think need to be improved, or an
API is not right, please let me know.
There is one very important point, I like to to see not improved:
Currently web.py is small, relatively easy to understand and one
can use it even on very small machines. Even without database and
omitting the template system. I like this very much - it is a huge
advantage over Django etc. (I'm using Django as well, but for
other types of applications.)
Cheers
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web.py" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to webpy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to webpy@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
