On Thursday, 16 May 2013 10:17:03 UTC-3, Nickname wrote: > > Quoting "Anand Chitipothu" <anand...@gmail.com <javascript:>>: > > Main Priorities: > > > > * Python3 support > > Would the upcoming 3.4 async API be useful for web.py? > > > * Better integration with third-party tools > > Yes, I tried to integrate web.py with dbus, which needs the > glib mainloop. The solution was multiprocessing - not nice. > > > If there are any parts of web.py that you think need to be improved, or > an > > API is not right, please let me know. > > There is one very important point, I like to to see not improved: > Currently web.py is small, relatively easy to understand and one > can use it even on very small machines. Even without database and > omitting the template system. I like this very much - it is a huge > advantage over Django etc. (I'm using Django as well, but for > other types of applications.) > > Cheers > > @Nickname: I totally agree with you. Web.py have to keep things simple.
@Anand: How can we help? Give directions to everyone contribute. Where and how can we edit documentation to renew it? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to webpy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to webpy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
