* Paul Hoffman wrote: >If the WG wants a URI that meets the objectives that Phill laid out (and >I think that many of those are good objectives), something much simpler >without any ASN.1 in it would be better. I'd be happy to write a much >simpler proposal if the WG wants.
That was my initial reaction aswell, but I am not entirely sure what the objectives are considering that they seemingly lead to discussing ASN.1 and DER and OIDs in the proposal. I do note that there have been many initiatives to draw digests into URI space, the "urn:sha1:" convention is popular for instance but currently unregistered. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjo...@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ _______________________________________________ websec mailing list websec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
